What Is Integrity? See Examples in the Workplace
When agents thus constitute themselves without ambivalence (that is,unresolved desire for a thing and against it) or inconsistency (thatis, unresolved desire for incompatible things), then the agent haswhat Frankfurt calls wholeheartedness. On one way of developing theintegrated-self view of integrity, wholeheartedness is equated withintegrity. It should be noted that self-conflict is not limited todesire. Conflict also ranges over commitments, principles, values, andwishes. Furthermore, all of these things—desires, commitments,values, and so on—are in flux. They change over time so thatachieving the kind of ‘wholeheartedness’ that Frankfurtdescribes is a never-ending process and task. Self-knowledge iscrucial to this process in so far as one must know what one’svalues, for example, are if one is to order them.
Essays on integrity in the workplace
On the assumption that integrity is a cluster concept of some kind,the question turns on whether anything ties together the varioustraits associated with integrity in a coherent overarching conceptionof integrity, one that makes it a clear virtue. One possibility isthat the traits of integrity are tied together by the idea ofsuccessfully taking one’s life seriously either in all itsimportant aspects (personal, intimate, social, professional,aesthetic, intellectual and emotional) or in some of them. The varietyof qualities that Cox, La Caze and Levine claim are needed forintegrity might not be an awkwardly heterogeneous collection they seemto be at first sight if they contribute in recognizable ways to thebusiness of successfully taking one’s life—in itself andas lived with others— seriously. Such a view requiresdevelopment of the idea of taking one’s life seriously, but itmight posses certain advantages. It might have an advantage overintegrationist views, for example, because it promises an explanationof why integration seems both important to integrity and alsosometimes in tension with it. Audi and Murphy explicitly deny thistension—they deny that a person of integrity will experiencevery much self-conflict except over clashing prima facie duties (Audiand Murphy 2006, 18). However, the idea that integrity is compatiblewith substantial self-conflict is defended by a number of authors (seethe discussion of integrity as self-integration in section 1).
McFall holds that the fact that ‘none of these claims can bemade with a straight face suggests that integrity is inconsistent withsuch principles.’ (McFall 1987, p. 9) The question, however, iswhether this is due to the formal constraints or substantiveconstraints; that is, whether attributions of integrity areconstrained by the content of principles a person maintains, or by waycertain kinds of principle fail to meet formal constraints on the waypersons of integrity hold to their principles. McFall appears tosuggest the latter interpretation.
Honesty An Integrity In The Workplace Free Essays
Nonetheless, some forms of self-deception are seriously detrimental tointellectual integrity. Gabriele Taylor (1981, 146) believes thatself-deception constitutes the most fundamental and important case oflack of integrity. She discusses an example which shows in anexemplary manner the dangers of self-deception—that of Casaubonin George Eliot’s Middlemarch (1994). Casaubon is acleric working on the connections between different religions, amammoth scholarly work he has devoted himself to for many years. InTaylor’s view, he is self-deceived about his commitment toscholarship. Casaubon’s problem may be seen as a conflictbetween his belief in his capacity and desire to write something veryimportant and his realization of the truth that he is incapable ofdoing so. The kind of failure of integrity here is partly due tofailure to take the views of others seriously, and thus differs fromcases where others might encourage one in self-deception. Casaubonacted to prevent his wife Dorothea and others from realising thepaucity of his researches. His case is more blameworthy because ofthis failure and it demonstrates the way in which self-deception canundermine intellectual integrity.
Ethics and Integrity in the Workplace the … | Thesis
This balance cannot be maintained without a certain degree ofreflection on the relationship between different intellectualcommitments. The importance of appropriate reflection to intellectualintegrity indicates that, like personal integrity, it is closelyrelated to self-knowledge. Self-knowledge appears essential tointegrity in general, and given that intellectual integrity concernsknowledge itself, the relationship between having intellectualintegrity and self-knowledge is particularly close. This closerelationship might lead one to assume that self-deception isantithetical to intellectual integrity because it undermines the kindof self-knowledge, such as knowledge of our intellectual strengths andcapacities, necessary to such reflection. However, self-deception doesnot necessarily undermine intellectual integrity. In fact,some self-deception might be necessary to pursue some lines of thoughtwell. Having integrity may be consistent with—may evenrequire—self-deceptive strategies to maintain one’sequilibrium in the face of conflicts and obstacles. As AmélieOksenberg Rorty (1994, 218) points out, self-deception can benecessary to be energized to do anything. The mild self-deception thatone has a good idea before one really has an idea at all is oftennecessary to get started on a piece of work.
The Importance of Integrity Essay - 1198 Words | Bartleby
There certainly can be conflict between types of integrity,particularly where the demands of a profession interfere with personaland moral integrity. Pursuit of one particular project can prevent usfrom balancing our commitments, as in Williams’s fictionalGauguin case. However, while different types of integrity can besequestered from each other, integrity of one type is more likely toflourish in a context of greater integrity in various spheres ofexistence. The kind of virtues and skills which are developed inmaintaining, say, intellectual integrity, are likely to be availableto make use of in dealing with the conflicts and temptations whichthreaten personal and moral integrity, and conversely.