The issue of Guns and gun control is complex.
Kennedy’s assassination sent shockwaves through the United States, which initiated the heated debate of gun control, and is continued today due to horrific mass shootings.
Gun control sounds wonderful in theory: no guns means no shootings.
On the other hand, gun control proponents claim that guns are the weapons of crime, so gun control can be a very effective measure to decrease current crime rates which are too high in most of the developed countries of the world. Strict gun control can make our life much safer and much longer, because the only purpose of guns is to take lives. Gun control can also help to avoid accidental shooting which results in killing thousands of people every year. Finally, those who do not belong to the group of fierce gun control opponents claim that limiting sales of weapon and ammunition can also solve the current crime situation in the world. Those are the main pro and con arguments which you can discuss in your research paper on gun control, which certainly should be supported with factual information and data.
One of the gun control facts cited looks at the prevalence of gun usage in homicides. Per the CDC, or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 70 percent of the 11,000 homicides in 2011 were committed with guns. That makes gun usage a prevalent cause of death, and therefore sparks some of the debate about gun control facts and implications.
Gun-control laws should support both sides of the debate.
Many people who do not agree with pro gun control argue that bad people will always find a way to get guns, and the only people really being punished or limited by these laws are honest citizenry.
Personally, I am pro gun control.
However, gun control statistics of other countries that limit or outlaw gun ownership completely, as well as state by state comparisons of where guns are and are not easier to purchase, are highly suggestive and there is a clear relationship between gun control measures that limit legal access, and a decrease in the amount of deaths and injuries by guns.
And everyone has an opinion on the gun control issue.
Pro gun control advocates will point out that the chances of a school shooter coming to any particular college lecture hall are incredibly low, while the likelihood that a scared armed student will accidentally hit someone who is unarmed and mistaken for a shooter, is a lot higher.
Gun control statistics can provide useful insights into this issue.
Given the level of damage that can be done quickly by a single firearm, as epitomized by so many tragic events of the past couple of decades, pro gun control advocates have struggled to penetrate the seemingly impenetrable armor of gun rights groups.
The solution to this issue is called gun control.
Along with New Deal legislation that gave the federal government a larger role in economic development, Roosevelt—and J. Edgar Hoover’s fairly new Federal Bureau of Investigation—championed an expansion of Washington’s law enforcement powers. These expansions targeted crimes that were very much in the public consciousness. After , kidnapping was made a federal crime. In the days of John Dillinger and Bonnie and Clyde, robbing any federally insured bank became also became a federal crime. And with tommy gun-toting gangsters on movie screens and in real-life back alleys, the White House’s focus turned to machine guns and short or sawed-off shotguns.
Gun Control can make this country a safer environment to live in.
Many people who are looking for a way to arm themselves at the last minute, or who cannot afford a thousand dollar black market gun, might still attempt to be violent, but will engage with weaponry that is less likely to be fatal in the way that guns often are.