The victory leads to Caesar's betrayal by his jealous companions.
In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus, and Mark Antony are innovators that gain direct support of the Roman masses and refute this idea of societies direct resistance to change....
Brutus was the only noble roman in Julius Caesar....
By portraying the qualities of honorable Brutus, William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, proves that anyone with good intentions, nobility, and the ability to recognize flaws can be a true hero.
Caesar later returns in the play as a ghost which haunts Brutus in Act V. Easily flattered by Decius Brutus (not to be confused with Brutus), Caesar appears to us as a man almost guided not so much by his own will but what he believes are the expectations his people have of "Caesar." This is why he is reluctant to show fear, Caesar, as he frequently refers to himself in the third person, fears nothing and can show no sign of weakness or indeed mortality...
In Julius Caesar, Brutus is a great example of a tragic hero.
We hear of no major failings in the managementof the provinces during his reign and certainly nothing on a par with therapacious activities of the likes of Caesar or Sulla under the Republic.
After Caesar's murder, however, their true personalities emerge.
Nevertheless,in Dio's revealing words, "nothing was done that did not please Caesar."As the administration of the state became more regularized, Augustus alsodrew administrators from the non-senatorial section of the elite, the .
However, others argue and name Julius Caesar as the tragic hero.
The army's commanders on-the-ground were handpicked legatesof Augustus; its campaign commanders were often the likes of Agrippa, ,or Gaius Caesar, that is, members of Augustus's own family or immediatecircle.
In Julius Caesar, Brutus is the well-respected idealist.
That Augustus interpretedhis daughter's misdeeds in political terms, at least in part, is suggestedby the trial for treason of one of Julia's lovers, Iullus Antonius, andhis subsequent execution or suicide; others of her lovers were banished.
Julia, now widowed a second time, was marriedto the following year.
Whatever the actual degreeof Julia's political acumen, the informal and allusive nature of the successionsystem itself was the root cause of her demise.
Caesar had twice been offered a royal diadem in front of thecrowd.
The sources unanimously ascribeJulia's fate to her licentiousness and immorality, but modern scholarshave rightly questioned this presentation and seen instead dynastic schemingbehind Julia's actions and subsequent banishment.